E-Business Essay Example for Free

E-Business Essay A Brick and Mortar business is a physical store or office usually referred to by people belonging to the online network. It is very important to know that Brick and mortar establishments have several advantages compared to online businesses. They are less likely to disappear overnight, and hence people have more trust and assurance with them. People are more likely to physically meet the businessmen and respond with them in case an issue arises. In case of any problem, the customer would like to meet a senior and responsible individual from the company (such as a manager or the executive) and resolve the issue. However, having a brick and mortar business alone would have several problems. People from other areas (other than the local area) would not be able to access the services of the company. Traveling to the office and doing business could lead to a lot of stress and waste of time and resources. The process of doing an offline business is highly manual. Hence, it would be ideal if the company has both, an online business and a brick and mortar business (to supplement the needs of each forms of business) (Teo, 2003 Osgoodby, 1996). Several travel companies such as Expedia, Hotwire. com and Cheaptickets. com, operated brick and mortar services and soon began to launch their own websites. This was basically done to alter the supply chain (various processes and technologies that existed between the supplier and the customer whilst providing the services were altered in a systemic manner). The web enabled services form the center of all digital activity of the company and could provide cost-effective services. The online services provide the companies with a lot of flexibility in providing their services. The businesses are constantly in strong control over their services. Launching online services would seem to improve the efficiency and would provide a lot of benefits. Web technology provides the company an opportunity to modify the business strategy without spending much in terms of financial resources. The company is in a better position to compete with others. The speed at meeting the demands of the customers was drastically improved by having online services, as business could be conducted in an organized and efficient manner. Customers were in better control to make decisions. Studies have shown that the customer satisfaction levels drastically improved. Besides, the businesses were in better control to manage their operations and logistics. The companies were in a better position to sell their products or services faster to a much more global customer network. The paperwork required to conduct online business was minimal. Companies were also able to showcase their products better through online means (InfoScaler Technologies, 2004).

Scholarship Essay: Im Fascinated by the Universe :: College Admissions Essays

"Did life exist on Mars?" "What would it take to build a spaceship that could travel at the speed of light?" "When will the moon be colonized?" These are just some of the questions that wander through my mind all day. Fascinated by the secrets of the universe, I yearn to uncover mysteries. In order to blast open all the closed gates between knowledge and myself, I need the powerful tools of education. After I graduate from high school, I plan to attend a college or university that has strong mathematics and science departments. Even now, I am actively preparing to enter the realm of science, taking college-level math and physics classes through the Running Start program. Upon receiving a college degree, my life-long dream is to engage in scientific research for NASA. Unfortunately, most colleges notable for their academic standards are also renowned for costly tuition. My family consists of one working parent and two children who wish to attend college.

John Locke V Thomas Hobbes Essay

Locke and Hobbes both had detailed accounts as to what the state of nature is. I will start with Hobbes and what he felt the state of nature is made up of. Hobbes believed in defining the state of nature as what it is instead of what it ought to be. So he focused in on the nature of people and came to a very descriptive conclusion as to how survive in this particular state of nature. He stated that man was equal in ambition, cruelty, and treachery, which in turn makes humans equal in the ability to kill each other. This is important because he believes that people can not live in peace in the state of nature because of those reasons. Also because of this he states that there are three principals of quarrels; competition, diffidence, and glory. Hobbes feels that because of human nature these three reasons to fight would take over and make the state of nature a state of war. Locke also has an opinion to the state of nature. He feels that men would respond to things and people around them with reason and rationality. Therefore he feels that a state of nature for the most part peaceful and pleasant. He also states that the natural law would guide humans in a state of nature. He thinks that people know right from wrong and are capable of doing both but it is upon the individual to carry out these values. In order to deal with the state of nature each of the two suggests a social contract. Whatever the contract is should be the obligations placed upon the people. They both believe in this particular agreement they just differ as to who it should be between. Hobbes speaks of the Leviathan and believes that the contract should be between the ruled and the ruler. He states that a strong ruler is the only way to enforce the social contract. He says that all me are born with three rights: the right to property, liberty, and life. He believes that the only important right is the right to life because without that right you cannot have a chance to enjoy the other two. So his contract consists of the subjects giving up the other two to the leviathan so that he can ensure the right to life. Locke’s social contract differs in many ways. One of them is Locke does not believe that individuals should not give up liberty, but instead give up the right to punish people who commit wrongdoings and leave that up to a overwhelming force, in this case the popular sovereignty. His belief of the state of nature which is that man would use their reasoning and be rational when dealing with other people. So his contract is between the elected and the people. Locke and Hobbes social contract may be different but in ways they are similar. They both believe in revolt if the contract is broken, but they state it differently. Hobbes believes in the monarch so the revolt against him would be different then Locke’s society of popular sovereignty, but in short it both of them called for persecution in such case. Still the case that called for persecution would naturally be different because of the different types of governments these men called for. For example Locke says it is time to revolt when a ruler tries to get absolute power of the people; but Hobbes states that the leviathan needs to have absolute power and the only time to revolt is if the monarch is not able to protect the people he rules over. Hobbes explains the relationship between the subjects and ruler as do what you told and you will not be killed. This means that these people could not say anything about the way the sovereign is running the kingdom or you are subject to death. This is so in the way Hobbes looked at it because the only way to control the people is a state strong enough to persecute someone for this particular reason. The monarch that Hobbes feels is the only way to govern should not be questioned by anyone as so long he is able to protect the people of the land. Locke’s view of the relationship is really different. Based on the concept of popular sovereignty the sovereign are the people; so the relationship is more give and take or democratic. This is a very important concept to Locke’s ideas because this is what differs him the most from Hobbes. His democracy is broken down into three branches; executive, legislative, and federal. The elected officials in these positions are an extension of the people so the people who make up the state serves the people until the people are tired of them. What Hobbes and Locke say about people moving into a political society from a state of nature is pretty similar and all most the same. Both say that contracts between people were necessary, but the dilemma in that is that in a state of nature there is no one to enforce the contracts between people. Both of them thought about this concept and figured that in order to move in to a political society someone was needed to enforce these contracts. Hobbes believes that the only one strong enough to force contracts is the monarch. Locke believes the same thing about someone being strong enough to force the contracts but he thinks it should be the elected doing so. Locke’s two treatises limited sovereignty more so than it has before. Locke called for a separation of powers. He broke it down into three sections and combined it with the popular sovereignty; therefore the many limitations were in place. I believe Locke included this idea into is first and second treatise because he wanted to not allow the abuse of power that is so evident in a monarchy. This is important because this is what our American system of democracy is based upon. Hobbes system of government there is very little limitation. The only limitation I can see is when the monarch does not provide for the security of the people and they revolt. Though that limitation is called upon by Hobbes the rest of the terms of the monarch have no limitations. The monarch is the ruler and no one can go against him because he is the divine and going against him is going against god. So the limitations of a monarch are pretty much is inexistent in Hobbes’s the Leviathan. The rights of the subjects according to Hobbes are the right to live and that is it. The other rights now belong to the Leviathan; this is needed according to Hobbes to ensure security. A monarch that gives too many rights to the people is too weak to defend them. This is so because if the monarch is questioned a lot it takes away the fear of the ruler. Hobbes says that fear is needed to keep the people in check. Therefore a sovereign must practice a policy known as shock and awe. Without this strategy someone would feel that they might be able to challenge the monarch. So rights that the subjects hold on the sovereign are limited to the right to revolt if the monarch fails to protect them. Locke thinks that people should hold more rights to the elected. The subjects have the right to put people in the state and take them out. Locke gives people the right to liberty and property. This is different from Hobbes because Hobbes said to give those rights up. Locke says that you can have rights that Hobbes said would not work in transforming into a political society. Hobbes says that subjects cannot ensure that the sovereign roles for the greater good. Because if they are alive it is the greater good according to Hobbes; so what can they do to ensure that the ruler is operating for the greater good? According to Hobbes nothing because you can not go against the Leviathan on how he is ruling, and to do so can result in you getting killed. So once again the subject has very little to say in the Hobbes ideology. Locke also has a conflicting view with Hobbes on this ability to check the sovereign to make sure he is operating for the good of the people. The main thing that allows them to ensure what the government doing is right is the ability bring charges against any wrongdoings. This is powerful because it does not only kick those people out of office but also brings persecution to them. Another powerful way to make sure government is doing the right thing is the ability to vote or not to vote for people who make up the state. Both Locke and Hobbes are modern political philosophers with different ways of reaching the same objective. Their objective is to transform a state of nature into a political society. Though they disagree on what a state of nature is and they disagree on which is the better political society, but both were apparently right. This is so because both of the philosophies can be applied to life today, which is in a whole different context of their time.

Organization And Nursing Mission And Vision - 1797 Words

Organizational Analysis Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center (TMC) is the largest not-for-profit healthcare system in Texas. The organization serves Houston and surrounding communities with a total of 12 facilities. This particular campus is an academic level one trauma hospital located in the heart of the TMC. The TMC is one of the biggest leading medical centers in the world and has approximately 50 medical facilities and around 20 hospitals. Memorial Hermann Hospital TMC encompasses several specialty areas such as transplant, burns, neurology, cardiovascular, trauma, general medicine, specialty surgery, pediatric, and air ambulance service. The hospital is licensed for 1,082 bed capacity (Memorial Hermann Hospital, 2015). Memorial Hermann has also accomplished movement in the community that includes clinics for health and wellness, and was categorized as one of the top five largest health care systems in the nation by Truven Health for patient safety and quality (Texas Medical Center, n.d.). Organization and Nursing Mission and Vision The mission and vision statement not only gives an explanation of what or who you are as a company or corporation. A mission and vision statement also articulates what an individual or an organization seek to strive for, the aspiration to flourish and involve members for years to come (Remvig, 2010). The Memorial Hermann Hospital organization is a community owned level one trauma academic facility which details theirShow MoreRelatedOrganization And Unit Mission, Vision, And Values. According1720 Words   |  7 PagesOrganization and Unit Mission, Vision, and Values According to Huber (2014), in order to accomplish a common goal, an organization needs to have a teamwork. The organizational social structure of health care system has a crucial role in forming an environment that is focused on patient care (Huber, 2014). More than ever before, health care organizations are expected to meet the patient’s needs. Most developed organizations have their own mission, vision, and values. An organizational mission statementRead MoreOrganization And Unit Mission : Vision And Values, And Shared Governance1441 Words   |  6 PagesOrganization and Unit Mission, Vision and Values, and Shared Governance In this paper I will discuss the mission, vision, values, and goals of the organization of which I work. Then I will share the organization’s nursing mission and philosophy, and my individual nursing unit mission and philosophy, and my part in fulfilling the mission and philosophy. I will explain the connection between the nursing department, nursing unit, and the organization’s philosophy. Strategies that could strengthen theRead MoreEssay on Vission, Mission and Nursing Philosophy1008 Words   |  5 Pages Vision, Mission and Nursing Philosophy Mercedes Condom RN University of Phoenix NUR 588 10/13/2014 Every health care organization in the United Stated has a mission statement and a vision. We also can say that the mission and vision guides the organization purpose of service and practice. This is also true for colleges and universities. We also have an understanding that creating a philosophy that supports the values of the organization is essentialRead MoreOrganizational Systems and Structures Evaluation Essay example1635 Words   |  7 Pageshealth care organizations develop a culture of safety such that an organizations care processes and workforce are focused on improving the reliability and safety of care for patients (Groves, Meisenbach, Scott-Cawiezell, 2011). In order to address an issue related to health care quality, it is important to look at the frameworks that will analyze an organization and identify opportunities to improve performance. The purpose of this paper is to provide a description of an organization and an analysisRead MoreThe Philosophy Of Azure Co llege A Nursing Institution1159 Words   |  5 PagesPractice Model Nursing career is one of the most respectful professions not only in the United States but also around the world. The remarkable aspect that makes nursing in such position is the evolution of the nursing theorists, the nursing theories, and the nursing philosophy. Among of these three, the nursing philosophy is the one that really identifies the nursing mission, and the fundamental evidence-based practice of nursing. In this case, many health organizations include nursing schools designRead MoreStrategic Planning : Mission And Vision934 Words   |  4 Pagesof developing a set of steps for the organization to use to accomplish its mission and vision. The plan takes on a broad perspective of the organization and is accomplished through strategic thinking which draws upon the past, understands the present, and envisions a better future. The plan requires an analysis of the organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and, threats both internal, and external to the organization (Falk, 2015). Nursing leadership is an integral part of theRead MoreNursing Leadership At Memorial Miramar Hospital1485 Words   |  6 PagesThis Nursing leadership interview was conducted with Gessy Targete-Johnson, who is currently the Director of Nursing Family Birthplace at Memorial Miramar Hospital. I decided to conduct my interview with her, due to the fact that this is a career goal I wish to accomplish. She has been in the Nursing Field for over 25 years. Gessy decided to enter the nursing field because, she has compassion for others and she wanted to make a difference in lives. She started out as a Labor Delivery NurseRead MoreThe Progression Of Social Development1628 Words   |  7 Pagesdevelopment is the culture of an organization; and as the culture changes, the people within the organization also change. Leaders can operate as change agents to bring about transformation and success in an organization by creating and implementing a vision for the future. This paper will endeavor to discuss the following: the chall enges of transformation of complex systems; the writer’s chosen organization’s mission, values, and overall goals; how the organization is viewed in the community; theRead MoreHistory, Mission And Philosophy Of The Organization1052 Words   |  5 PagesHistory, Mission and Philosophy of the Organization or Board of Directors: Founded in 1986, the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, set its goals to advance the science and education of psychiatric or mental health nursing. It was also established to unify this specialty. Currently there are 40 states or local chapters. This organization promotes the health, wellness and recovery of mental illnesses. Their reason for being developed is the expressed in seven core values of empowermentRead MoreNursing Leadership At Memorial Miramar Hospital1484 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction This Nursing leadership interview was conducted with Gessy Targete-Johnson, who is currently the Director of Nursing Family Birthplace at Memorial Miramar Hospital. I decided to conduct my interview on her, due to the fact that this is a career goal I wish to accomplish. She has been in the Nursing Field for over 25 years. Gessy decided to enter the nursing field because, she has compassion for others and she wanted to make a difference in lives. She started out as a Labor Delivery